Campaign

The Real Price of Priceless

Live events bring us together and create memories that last a lifetime, but unfair dynamic pricing is putting them out of reach. With The Real Price of Priceless campaign, Euroconsumers calls for a ban on dynamic pricing for concerts, theatre and sporting events, to restore fair, transparent and affordable access to culture and sport for everyone.

Filed with

European Comission

The case

What is the real price of priceless?

When one seller sets the price of a memory

Concerts, theatre and sporting matches are moments we treasure. They bring people together and create experiences that feel truly priceless. But today, the real price of these moments is increasingly out of reach, because of unfair dynamic pricing.

What is dynamic pricing?

With dynamic pricing, ticket prices are no longer fixed. Instead, algorithms adjust them in real time based on demand and other variables, such as market trends, the time of year and competitors’ prices.

Why is it a problem for live events?

Dynamic pricing can play a legitimate role in competitive markets. Designed fairly and transparently, it can help smooth demand, improve access and make pricing more efficient. But live events are rarely a competitive market. They are often dominated by a single organiser or ticket seller, leaving fans no alternative. If you want to see a particular artist, attend a specific performance or support your national team, there is only one place to buy a ticket, on one date, in one location.

In such a captive, emotionally charged market, fair dynamic pricing becomes an illusion. It stops being a tool for market efficiency and becomes a way to extract the maximum from fans.

What this means in practice for fans?

Fans are pushed into a bidding contest where prices only go up, sometimes dramatically, in real time. A €50 ticket can double or triple within hours, simply because the algorithm decides so.

Fans are punished for their enthusiasm: the more people want to attend, the more expensive it gets.
There is no added value: unlike better seats or extra services, dynamic pricing does not improve the experience. The show, the match and the seat stay exactly the same; only the price changes.
People are excluded: everyone who cannot or will not pay inflated prices for the same experience is shut out.
Trust is destroyed: when prices feel unpredictable and exploitative, fans lose faith in event organisers and ticket platforms, and in a fair digital market as a whole.

Why this matters now: the FIFA World Cup

FIFA’s use of dynamic pricing for World Cup 2026 tickets shows how urgent this issue has become. The World Cup is a moment millions of fans dream of experiencing, yet there are no alternative sellers, no competing platforms and no way to buy elsewhere. In this fully captive market, prices can soar without explanation or limits, and fans may pay dramatically different prices for the exact same seat simply because demand is high. Without meaningful safeguards or transparency, this model risks excluding the very supporters who bring the World Cup to life.

Our call

Euroconsumers believes in transparent, fair and fixed ticket prices that reflect the real cost of putting on an event, not the maximum fans can be made to pay. We urge regulators, event organisers and ticketing platforms to ban dynamic pricing in live events and make culture and sport accessible to everyone again.

Because the value of an experience isn’t in the money spent, it’s in the memories made.

Linked to this case

The campaign and the papers behind it

The complaint started as a position on dynamic pricing, supported by a campaign that brought the practice into the spotlight

Litigation linked

Other actions on the same argument

Dominance market position used against the fans who have no alternative.

Policy in action

Defending it in public

Panels and meetings where this case was on the table. Everything we said is on the record.

Every litigation case we run is on the record

Letters, complaints and collective actions, with the documents that back them.

All litigation cases