Litigation case
Ongoing

Citroën - Takata explosive airbag case

The Citroën recall began in late 2023 with a warning to check faulty Takata airbags. A second, urgent notice soon followed, urging drivers to stop using affected cars because in the event of an accident, the airbag, produced by the Takata company, could explode and cause serious consequences.

Filed against

Stellantis N.V. and Groupe PSA Italia S.p.A.

Launched

October 2024

Timeline

How the case developed

In October 2024, Altroconsumo, a member of Euroconsumers, launched a class action against Stellantis N.V. and Groupe PSA Italia S.p.A., seeking compensation for drivers affected by the defective Takata airbags installed in Citroën C3 and DS3 vehicles.

11 June 2026

The Court of Turin has upheld Altroconsumo’s request in the precautionary action concerning Takata airbags in some Opel models, ordering Opel/Stellantis to improve communications, provide alternative mobility, and launch a national information campaign to ensure consumer safety.

Read More
25 July 2025

The Turin Court of Appeal confirmed the admissibility of Altroconsumo's class action against Stellantis.

Read More
14 April 2025

Demand for compensation on behalf of consumers in Euroconsumers countries following admissibility order by the Tribunal of Turin

Read More
14 April 2025

Class action admitted in Italy

Read More
29 October 2024

Altroconsumo has started a class action against Stellantis NV and the PSA Italia SpA group, aimed at obtaining compensation

Read More
7 June 2024

Formal letter sent by Altroconsumo PSA , the group to which the brand belongs, demanding that the situation be resolved as soon as possible

Read More
The case

Dangerous Takata airbags

A deadly defect, a delayed response

In 2023, an urgent recall was issued for the Citroën C3 and DS3, warning that their front airbags, made by the now-bankrupt Japanese company Takata, could be defective. A follow-up notice went further, instructing drivers to stop using their cars immediately: the airbags could explode when deployed, causing fatal or life-changing injuries.

What this means in practice for drivers?

Faced with a grave safety risk, motorists rushed to arrange replacements, but the process was anything but smooth. Drivers struggled to get appointments at authorised service centres, faced long waiting times and shortages of replacement parts, and ran into technical problems on Citroën’s website for booking the free replacement.

Many were left without their cars for weeks or even months, with no replacement vehicle, no clear timeline for repairs, and often having to rent a car at their own expense. More than 170,000 motorists in Italy alone were unable to use their cars because of the manufacturer’s inefficient handling of the recall.

Altroconsumo takes action

Altroconsumo first sent a formal notice to PSA Group, Citroën’s parent company, demanding swift action. Despite promises, the situation remained unresolved. In October 2024, it launched a class action against Stellantis NV and PSA Italia SpA to secure compensation for affected drivers.

Altroconsumo proposes compensation of €1,500 for non-financial damages, covering the distress, inconvenience and stress caused by the safety risk, plus €17.24 for each day of delay, equal to the average cost of renting a small car. A driver who waited three months could therefore claim over €3,000. Under the Italian system, a judge will set the final amounts.

The Court of Appeal of Turin has now rejected the companies’ appeal, clearing the way for around 170,000 affected owners to join the action.

Equal redress across the Single Market

This is great news for Italian drivers, but Citroën C3 and DS3 owners in other countries have yet to receive the same redress. Consumers in Belgium, Spain and Portugal faced the same safety risks, the same inconvenience and the same financial losses.

Euroconsumers has formally called on Stellantis NV to provide fair and adequate compensation to all affected consumers in its member countries. In a single market, consumers should not receive different treatment depending on where they bought their car.

Every litigation case we run is on the record

Letters, complaints and collective actions, with the documents that back them.

All litigation cases