Back
News
03.06.2026

Beyond the social media ban: what will really protect children’s safety and rights online?

Euroconsumers and Eurochild say that restricting young people’s access to social media is not the right way to safeguard them from harm.

Euroconsumers and Eurochild say that restricting young people’s access to social media is the wrong way to safeguard them from harm. 

Instead, we have jointly proposed ten recommendations for building a safe, enjoyable and empowering online environment that protects minors from the risks of the online world whilst keeping open access to the connections and opportunities that they value so much.  

These recommendations will feed into the ongoing work of the European Commission and describe what needs to happen to improve the current system, strengthen the legislative framework, fix the platform business model and make it fit for children.

❜❜

The conversation about children’s safety and rights in the digital world needs to move well beyond the debate on social media bans. To empower young people with the knowledge, skills and autonomy they want and need o navigate the online world in a safe and confident way, we must look at the bigger picture and that starts with hearing from young people.

 

Els Bruggeman, Euroconsumers Group Head of Policy and Enforcement

Ten recommendations to make social media safe without resorting to a social media ban

  1. (Re)enforce what we already have: make it a priority to enforce provisions in the Digital Services Act, AI Act, GDPR, and Audiovisual Media Services Directive that already protect children. 
  2. A higher age limit by itself will not solve the problem: the core question is not just what the age limit should be, but whether effective measures are in place to provide age-appropriate, rights-respecting and safe-by-design services for all children.
  3. Open the data, build the trust: give researchers access to platform data to allow for proper independent scientific scrutiny and support evidence-based policy.
  4. Make “safe-by-design” the legal default for all digital services accessible to children: this includes stronger privacy settings, filtering if inappropriate content, and switching off manipulative design choices. If a feature only works by keeping users hooked, it shouldn’t be on by default.
  5. Empower choice, eliminate manipulation: design recommendation systems that respect children’s preferences by helping children define for themselves what they want to explore and enjoy online. In addition, the Digital Fairness Act should prohibit behavioral advertising for children for all traders.
  6. Slowing things down: Introduce “positive friction” in children’s accounts, such as “think before you share” prompts or limits on reshares, to help young users manage their time and behaviour more consciously.
  7. Help on hand: Children should have access to clear, accessible and child-friendly reporting and support channels where platforms respond within clear timeframes, explain what action has been taken and cooperate with trusted helplines, hotlines and support services.
  8. Age verification as a tool, not the full solution: age verification must be necessary, proportionate, privacy-friendly, robust, non-discriminatory and transparent. It should not be used as a one-size-fits-all answer to children’s rights and data protection.
  9. The digital environment should be age appropriate: All children under 18 should benefit from a high level of protection online. However, safeguards should reflect children’s evolving capacities which means age-appropriate safeguards across the whole under-18 spectrum, not a single cut-off that treats all children the same.
  10. Shape the rules together with children: Children should be directly involved in designing policies that affect their digital lives. We know from Euroconsumers’ national dialogues and our multi-country survey that minors are not just passive users, but have clear, thoughtful and often very practical views on what works and what doesn’t.

This is a summarised list, you can find the full recommendations ‘Beyond the Ban: What can really protect children’s safety and rights online?’ here.

What do young people think about the social media ban and their lives online?

The recommendations came from a roundtable co-hosted with Eurochild, a network of over 200 organizations and individuals working with and for children in Europe. At the event, we brought evidence from young people to the table to show how experience and view the benefits and challenges of lives lived online. 

The event heard from Martin Harris Hess, Head of Sector for Protection of Minors Online at DG Connect, Euroconsumers’ Els Bruggeman and Mieke Schuurman, Director of Child Rights and Capacity Building at Eurochild. 

The discussion with participants including policymakers, child rights advocates, experts and some tech platforms encouraged a broader approach to online safety, emphasizing safety‑by‑design, stronger platform responsibility, and better risk management instead of a narrow focus on a single measure.  

It is the latest step in Euroconsumers’ commitment to nurturing a young-person centered conversation about what they want from their online future. We have consistently sought out ways to ensure the voices of young internet users are part of the policy debates that will decide their future digital experiences. 

Here’s more details on the ways that Euroconsumers and its members have opened up a dialogue with young people across Europe which we have shared with policy makers to consider proposals like social media bans in the context of young people’s real lives online: 

Growing up online survey: Building a digital future for minors, by minors 

In late 2025, Euroconsumers surveyed 3,351 teenagers aged 12–17 from Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Poland to address a major gap in public debates about their digital future.  

The survey of their experiences, concerns and ideas for the future found

  • For young people, the internet is a gateway to new knowledge and skills, a practical tool, a source of creativity and a hive of social connection. But 46% of those surveyed reported they had encountered some type of threat online.
  • Over half (57%) believe algorithms encourage them to spend more time on social media than they intended,
  • Default features got support, 64% thought features like blurring inappropriate content would be useful, and 53% supported having specific default settings for minors’ accounts. 
  • Most importantly, young people make a powerful call to be heard. They envisioned a holistic approach: intelligent regulation, accountable platforms, supportive parenting and meaningful youth empowerment and engagement.

National dialogues: young people speak out on social media bans and their digital future

We followed up with a series of national events with young people. Across our members in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Belgium, over 200 teenagers joined roundtables and workshops to openly debate the risks and opportunities of their digital worlds.  You can see their input in this short video.

They told us how much they value online platforms for helping them stay connected with friends and family, listen to music, share photos and memories, follow the news, learn new things and create images. But they wanted platforms to do more to protect and empower young users.

Their practical suggestions for creating a safer digital space included having better reporting channels, banning smartphones in schools, turning off infinite scrolling, blocking messages from strangers, requiring explicit prompts about user preferences and time limits on gaming. 

Teens take on social media bans and digital fairness  

We carried on the conversation with a public deep dive into how young people felt about lives online when we partnered with the European Youth Press at our Start Talking webinar in January 2026 called Teens’ take on Digital Fairness.  

The young participants discussed their views on the growing trend of age limits for social media:   

❜❜

A ban would get rid of many of the benefits that social media has for young people – and we don’t even know yet if it works to keep people safe.

And warned against blaming screens and social media for all of the challenges young people face: 

❜❜

There are also other issues that impact young people like poor mental health and climate change. Social media amplifies these existing problems but taking it away will not make everything fine.

Keep young people’s voices central to social media ban discussions

All of our work to surface young voices comes from our belief that minors are not just passive users – they are experts in their own experience and that must be shared with those who are creating rules that govern their online world.

And when it comes to online protection and social media bans, teenagers can feel that the whole world is talking about them but not to them. 

Despite its simplicity and good intentions, restrictive bans could cut young people off from connection and creativity, and relieve platforms of their responsibility to building safe environments for younger users.

The answer which young people want and which is reflected in our ten recommendations is more complex and requires a more co-ordinated effort and buy-in from everyone involved. But ultimately it will deliver the safe, empowering online environments that young people want and young people deserve.  

Young digital consumers want to be heard: we must start listening.